The View From Wisconsin

All point totals are using the Yahoo Fantasy Sports method of points for Football: 1 point for 20 yards rushing or receiving, or 25 yards passing; 6 points for touchdowns; -2 points for INT's or fumbles lost; 3 points for FG's from 0-39 yards, 4 for FG's from 40-49 yards, and 5 from 50+; sacks are 1 point, INT's and fumble recoveries are 2 points, and extra points are either one point (kicked) or two points (pass/rush/receiving).

QB - Drew Brees, New Orleans (293 pts.) Yanno, five thousand yards is a pretty good total for any quarterback. The problem for the Saints, though, was that despite his eight games with 100+ passer ratings, he had six games with sub-70 passer ratings. The last one knocked the Saints out of the playoff race in their 27-24 loss to Chicago - and it likely knocked a few of his owners out of the playoffs as well.
RB - DeAngelo Williams, Carolina (193 pts.) Eight straight weeks with at least one rushing touchdown (nine straight with the four-yard TD pass he caught week seven); two four-TD games in that stretch, and four straight 100-yard games.
RB - Michael Turner, Atlanta (177 pts.) He had great book-ends to a pretty decent season. 220 against Division II Detroit week one, and 208 against Division I-FCS Saint Louis week 17, and maybe only four bad games during the season - all in the first half.
WR - Larry Fitzgerald, Arizona (136 pts.) Who says he's over the hill? Thanks to the resurgence of the Redbirds and Kurt Warner, he set career bests in yards and touchdowns. And, unlike last year where he lost three fumbles, he only put the ball on the ground once - and didn't lose it.
WR - Calvin Johnson, Detroit (130 pts.) A bright spot in a very dismal year for the Lions. They had to throw from the start, since they were usually down by a few touchdowns very early in most games. 1,331 yards and 12 touchdown catches is great on a horrid team - though two fumbles lost hurt.
WR - Andre Johnson, Houston (118 pts.) He had that monster 207-yard game against Tennessee, but he generally had hot-and-cold days for the Texans. Still, his 1,575 yards was a career best, and 8 TD's receiving matched his 2007 mark. He could be a big fantasy pickup next year - especially if he stays healthy.
TE - Tony Gonzalez, Kansas City (103 pts.) Yawn. 1,058 yards and 10 TD's, what else is new? Gonzalez actually broke double-digits in TD's for the first time since 2003, though his yardage total was down slightly from 2007. Still, his fourth 1,000 yard receiving season - as a Tight End, no less.
K - Stephen Gostkowski, New England (159 pts.) He had points in each of the Pats' games; he was a perfect 40-for-40 in PAT's (he hasn't missed a regular season PAT since December 31, 2006); and he was 10-for-12 in FG attempts from 40 or more yards.
DEF - Baltimore Ravens (196 pts.) The best point-getter that wasn't a quarterback in 2008; they benefited from six defensive TD's and 26 INT's to reach the mark of "best fantasy defense". They may need that in their Wild Card game this weekend against the Dolphins.

It's just an old trunk, right?



Not quite. Look closer.



Yes, it's an antique valise trunk, complete with a "storage tray".



Ah, but that's not the reason why my Aunt and cousin got me this particular "old trunk" for Christmas:



Yep. It's one of Uncle Secor's trunks, made in Racine.

And I can't be happier. :)

Labels: Secor Trunk

A little toy I got at BigHugeLabs (the home of the Motivational Poster Generator):

It's that time again: Time to rate which Bowl games are best (and worst) for this year's run to the mythical BCS Championship Game.

Rankings are based on two factors: the combined BCS Rating of both teams (Strength) and the difference between the BCS Ratings of both teams (Spread). BCS Rating is used with the same basic formula as the actual rankings, but with the rankings extended to all Division I-BCS teams.

For teams that are unranked in the two polls, teams are given a ranking of 41 in the Harris and 41.5 in the Coaches' Poll. Florida leads the nation with a BCS Rating of .97418, with Oklahoma second at .97296 and Texas third at .94282. The lowest ranked team is North Texas, with a rating of .00208 (three rankings of 119, two 120 and a 117 in the six computer rankings).

The average Division I-BCS team has a rating of .23718; Clemson is closest to that mark with a rating of .23889, good for 36th overall. This is a major drawback to the rankings, as teams that are not ranked in the two human polls suffer by over-reliance on the computer rankings.

To derive a particular Bowl's Quality Rating, the combined BCS Ratings for each game is averaged out (.72120), as is the average difference between the two teams' BCS Ratings (.09668). Then, the combined Strength rating for the game is divided by the average, and multiplied by 100. The Spread between the two teams is similarly divided by the average and multiplied by 100. Then, the Strength percentage is reduced by the Spread percentage to produce the Bowl's Quality Rating.

The "average" Bowl game would rank at exactly 0; Bowl Games ranked 100 or better tend to be the best games, while games ranked -100 or worse tend to be stinkers.

The Five Best Bowl Games This Season

1. The BCS Championship Game, Florida vs. Oklahoma (Miami, Florida, January 8, 2009). Duh, you say. After all, the BCS Ratings were geared for this, right? Well, you can't aruge with the fact that this one has the highest combined BCS Ratings along with the second lowest spread between the two teams. This one has "dandy" written all over it.
2. Rose Bowl, USC vs. Penn State (Pasadena, CA, January 1, 2009). This may very well be another "duh" moment. The two elite teams from the Pac-10 and Big 10 are meeting on the big stage, and JoePa's bunch are competitive enough that they may give Pete Carroll's Trojan squad a game.
3. Sugar Bowl, Alabama vs. Utah (New Orleans, LA, January 2, 2009). The most surprising thing about this one is how well the two teams did in the BCS Ratings. This is number 4 Alabama going up against number 7 (and undefeated) Utah. Though this may be very one sided for the Crimson Tide, it's also Utah's chance to prove it belongs in the BCS mix. If they win, they probably will move all the way up to... fourth in the final polls.
4. Holiday Bowl, Oklahoma State vs. Oregon (San Diego, CA, December 30, 2008). This one is surprising because the Spread between the two teams is rather modest (46.86%) than the other three non-Championship Bowls listed here. It's not exactly a powerhouse Bowl in terms of BCS Rating Strength (6th overall), but it could prove to be a good game. It's the best of the non-New Years games.
5. Poinsettia Bowl, Boise State vs. TCU (San Francisco, CA, December 23, 2008). This is the non-BCS-team championship game, of sorts; the best of the Mountain West (the Horned Frogs) against the best of the WAC (the undefeated Broncos). Though this matchup has the highest Spread in the top 10 Bowl Games (87.02%), it's the talent of Boise State that carries this one. Too bad they won't get the winner of Florida/Oklahoma, though.

The Five Worst Bowl Games This Season

1. The Cotton Bowl, Texas Tech vs. Ole Miss, (Dallas, TX, January 2, 2009). The Cotton Bowl deserves better than this for its swan song. The Red Raiders, who once had visions of playing in the BCS Championship game before the snafu that was the Big 12's Southern Division tiebreaker, are paired with a Mississippi team that is no where near their equal. Ole Miss lost three conference games and has as many losses in conference as the three SEC teams ranked ahead of them in the BCS standings. The Spread between the two teams in the BCS Ratings is a whopping .48403, or over 500% of the average. That total would be enough to land all but four of the remaining 33 bowl games with the worst Q-Rating in Division I-BCS. This game is easily the worst of the New Year's games.
2. Chick-fil-A Bowl, Georgia Tech vs. LSU (Atlanta, GA, December 31, 2008). The defending National Champions have fallen very hard. The Tigers got no votes in the last regular season Coaches Poll, and got no love from the computers. When South Florida finishes ahead of you in the BCS Ratings, you know you've hit bottom. Meanwhile, they face the ACC's third-best team in the Yellow Jackets, who didn't make it to their conference title game because of a loss to Virginia Tech. The Ramblin' Wreck actually finished ahead of the Hokies in the BCS Ratings because of more votes in the two human polls, but VT got the championship game gig – and the Orange Bowl berth for winning the ACC title. The spread is second only to the Cotton Bowl, with Georgia Tech holding a .38545 advantage over LSU. The former Peach Bowl is more of a bowl of pits for this one.
3. Las Vegas Bowl, BYU vs. Arizona (Las Vegas, NV, December 20, 2008). This is what the oddsmakers at the local casino sports books would call a "bad bet." This one features the third largest spread between two teams (.36652, 379.10%), with a combined BCS Rating total of a poor .69297 (96.09%). The Cougars could make this one a snorer – and also a big hurt to the casinos, who won't be getting many of BYU's Mormon alumni to hit the slots and blackjack tables while waiting for the trouncing of the U of A Wildcats.
4. GMAC Bowl, Ball State vs. Tulsa (Charlotte, NC, January 6, 2009). This is a prime example of what happens when there are too many Bowls. Ball State got this gig because they posted the best record in the Mid-America Conference (but lost the title game to Buffalo). Tulsa got this gig because they were the runner-up in the Conference USA championship game (losing to East Carolina). Tulsa is ranked behind the Bowl-ineligible Virginia Cavaliers in the BCS Ratings, which makes this a case of two lightly-regarded also-rans with a lot of distance between them.
5. Orange Bowl, Cincinnati vs. Virginia Tech (Miami, FL, January 1, 2009). When you host the BCS Championship, your other Bowl game gets the royal shaft. It's not the Orange Bowl committee's fault that they didn't take Texas Tech or TCU; they just wanted to have a conference champion in their game. That's what the Bearcats are: Big East champions. And Virginia Tech won the ACC championship game over Boston College, so it's a matchup of two conference champs. Too bad the computers don't particularly like the Hokies (ranked 17th in the computer ranking component). Of the games actually held on New Year's Day, this one might not be a good way to end the day.

Four More Bowls Of Interest (and Revulsion)

• Emerald Bowl, California vs. Miami, Florida (San Francisco, CA, December 27, 2008). This game, which has traditionally been a bit of a snoozer since its inception a few years prior, may have found a barn-burner of a game. The combined BCS Rating is not all that much (.49538, 68.69% of average), but the two teams are so incredibly close that their Spread percentage is less than 1%. That is primarily because the two sides are close in the computer rankings, but the Golden Bears were the only one of the two squads to get votes in the two human polls. Cal, of course, will be playing in their back yard at AT&T Park, but the 'Canes could finish out a disappointing season with a big win. This one could be settled by a missed extra point or field goal.
• Fiesta Bowl, Texas vs. Ohio State (Glendale, AZ, January 1, 2009). This one could get very, very ugly. UT has had a bad taste in their mouth ever since they were bypassed for the Big 12 Championship game because of the BCS Rankings. Their spread between BCS Ratings with the Buckeyes is the fifth largest (.20185, 208.77%) among the 34 Division I-BCS Bowls. Given that OSU is still hurting in the backfield, the Longhorns could stampede up and down the field at University of Phoenix Stadium. And, if OU squeaks out a close win over UF in Miami, a case could be made that they should be given a nod for a split National Championship.
• Independence Bowl, Louisiana Tech vs. Northern Illinois (Shreveport, LA, December 28, 2008). Clue number one that this could be a bad game: neither team received votes in the two human polls. Clue number two: there are two Bowl Eligible teams (San Jose State and Bowling Green State) that are ranked between them in the BCS Ratings. Clue number three: Tech's Bulldogs (who are, arguably, playing a home game) scored only five points more than they allowed. Clue number four: The NIU Huskies were ranked out of the top 100 in the Billingsley computer rankings. Fifth and final clue: the combined strength rating of the two teams' BCS Ratings is .25207, the lowest of all 34 Bowl games.
• St. Petersburg Bowl, South Florida vs. Memphis (St Petersburg, FL, December 20, 2008). For a first-time bowl, this one is a genuine stinker. Memphis is the lowest-rated team playing in a Bowl in the BCS Ratings (.07083, 96th), while South Florida had a horrendous conference record (2-5) in the Big East. Only a perfect 5-0 non-conference record got them the nod. What's scary is that there are not only four Bowl-eligible teams between the two in the BCS Rankings (besides SJSU and BGSU, there's Louisiana-Lafayette and Arkansas State), but there are 24 ineligible teams ranked between them. This game, which will be among the ones leading off the Bowl Season, might be a stumbling block towards the BCS title game – which may be the only game anyone will end up watching.

Labels: NCAA Division I BCS bowl games

I have a new t-shirt. Not another Admirals shirt, nor a Predators or Brewers or Packers shirt.

It simply says on it, "Buried."

Why, you ask?

Because I did something tonight that I should have done three decades ago.

The answer is on the back - Romans 6:4.

"We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life." (NIV)